Go Back   Part Time Poker Forums > Strategy > Strat - SNG

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 18th, 2008, 12:58 AM   #1 (permalink)

Player points 64787.55
Staker points 141315.11
Makeup owed $0.00
Makeup you owe $0.00

 
Vedder1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 02, 2006
Location: London
Posts: 25,536
Default 3 handed in a 180 turbo - wrong section but im after 45 man turbo players thoughts.


Ok i thought this was a call as my read is hes shoving ATC, a well respected mtt player called me a donkey, thoughts please. Im now not sure it was a good call. I dont mind honesty

PokerStars Game #15359134746: Tournament #77746046, $11+$1 Hold'em No Limit - Level XVII (2500/5000) - 2008/02/17 - 19:49:39 (ET)
Table '77746046 2' 9-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: Marsolinas (63370 in chips)
Seat 2: SirMoonMann (32042 in chips)
Seat 4: vedder1980 (174588 in chips)
Marsolinas: posts the ante 500
SirMoonMann: posts the ante 500
vedder1980: posts the ante 500
SirMoonMann: posts small blind 2500
vedder1980: posts big blind 5000
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to vedder1980 [7h Kh]
Marsolinas: folds
SirMoonMann: raises 26542 to 31542 and is all-in
vedder1980: calls 26542
*** FLOP *** [9h Ad 2h]
*** TURN *** [9h Ad 2h] [Qs]
*** RIVER *** [9h Ad 2h Qs] [9d]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
SirMoonMann: shows [Jc Td] (a pair of Nines)
vedder1980: shows [7h Kh] (a pair of Nines - Ace+King kicker)
vedder1980 collected 64584 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 64584 | Rake 0
Board [9h Ad 2h Qs 9d]
Seat 1: Marsolinas (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 2: SirMoonMann (small blind) showed [Jc Td] and lost with a pair of Nines
Seat 4: vedder1980 (big blind) showed [7h Kh] and won (64584) with a pair of Nines
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by draqq View Post
^ that being said it seems like all the big winners in the the 60/45s the last year or so, nsb incl., had serious ICM leaks and seemed to always operate closer to cEV, yet crush the games. so ICM probably is just a conspiracy to keep us all playing nitty while those in the know print money by playing straight cEV the whole time.
Vedder1980 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old February 18th, 2008, 12:59 AM   #2 (permalink)

Player points 29704.42
Staker points 616828.54
Makeup owed $0.00
Makeup you owe $0.00

 
mutigers5591's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 13, 2006
Posts: 29,236
Default


a good player is probably pushing top 85% there IMO so someone just needs to pokerstove it..personally i dont know how to work the thing.....
__________________
http://forum.parttimepoker.com/showt...0042....makeup rules...dont accept my reserves/shares if you do not accept these rules

mutigers5591 10,378 $4 $40 11% $45,703 Super Tilt N/A PokerStars S1-200 SNG Only
mutigers5591 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old February 18th, 2008, 01:00 AM   #3 (permalink)

Player points 64787.55
Staker points 141315.11
Makeup owed $0.00
Makeup you owe $0.00

 
Vedder1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 02, 2006
Location: London
Posts: 25,536
Default


Quote:
Originally Posted by mutigers5591 View Post
a good player is probably pushing top 85% there IMO so someone just needs to pokerstove it..personally i dont know how to work the thing.....
Is it worth noting that the chances of it being a good player are very slim

Stu.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by draqq View Post
^ that being said it seems like all the big winners in the the 60/45s the last year or so, nsb incl., had serious ICM leaks and seemed to always operate closer to cEV, yet crush the games. so ICM probably is just a conspiracy to keep us all playing nitty while those in the know print money by playing straight cEV the whole time.
Vedder1980 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old February 18th, 2008, 01:11 AM   #4 (permalink)

Player points 15607.06
Staker points 76868.70
Makeup owed $0.00
Makeup you owe $0.00

 
NateTrib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 26, 2007
Location: South Bend, Indiana
Posts: 14,502
Default


good call especially with his stack
__________________

NateTrib is offline   Reply With Quote


Old February 18th, 2008, 07:42 AM   #5 (permalink)

Player points 140.28
Staker points 5914.65
Makeup owed $0.00
Makeup you owe $0.00

 
joecast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 19, 2007
Location: honolulu, HI
Posts: 994
Default


K high is plenty enough to call with here. He is gonna play ATC unless he has been playing like a rock and the other guy in 2nd might make a mistake. more often than not K high will be good and even if u lose you are still in 1st. Good call hands down
__________________
joecast (honolulu) shootz
SS STATS HERE -
http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/6654/joecastgl8.jpg
joecast is offline   Reply With Quote


Advertisement
Old February 18th, 2008, 08:34 AM   #6 (permalink)

Player points 12561.66
Staker points 24211.80
Makeup owed $0.00
Makeup you owe $0.00

 
MrDurden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 19, 2007
Posts: 9,861
Default


i call most of the time, unless the guy has been super tight.....i like to gamble in these spots. He is shoving here all day with any reasonable 2 i assume--and your K7h looks better than most reasonable 2 cards... and it doesnt hurt your stack much so your only worry is doubling up a good player (if he is) other than that....its snap call time
__________________

MrDurden is offline   Reply With Quote


Old February 18th, 2008, 10:12 AM   #7 (permalink)

Player points 23127.45
Staker points 6511.58
Makeup owed $0.00
Makeup you owe $0.00

 
Acid Hound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 03, 2007
Posts: 11,249
Default


There was an interesting video about calling ATC shoves. Basically sheets determined against a player you are ~90% sure is shoving ATC, you need to have K9o+ to call. This is to give you a reasonable edge over whatever they have and the times you run into K10+.

I think K7 is too light and combined with the fact he probably is not the best player in the world meaning he might shove tighter, its a fold IMO... Its always better to be shoving anyway so just ship J high next hand
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by seventh_sam View Post
I just confirmed this actually. Once the OP was posted I sent an email to Stars Support & they just got back to me & said OP is "kind of a douchbag" so they have decided "to keep an idiot in suspense". Sorry dude.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cathar_here View Post
lol, this thread makes me want to punch baby seals
Acid Hound is offline   Reply With Quote


Old February 18th, 2008, 08:48 PM   #8 (permalink)

Player points 2056.26
Staker points 25073.97
Makeup owed $0.00
Makeup you owe $0.00

 
rayzor1748's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 01, 1970
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 13,223
Default


Not too sure if I like the call here... I would tend to think he wouldn't push against your stack with atc ... as he probably would fear being called by the big stack... of course being only 3 handed your playable hand range does increase abit; just personally hate risking doubling him up knowing (assuming) you're going into it behind to begin with...
__________________
"Beer Is Good"

rayzor1748 (buffalo) - stars
rayzor1748 - ftp /first letter B/ avatar venusflytrap
rayzor1748 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old February 18th, 2008, 08:56 PM   #9 (permalink)

Player points 64787.55
Staker points 141315.11
Makeup owed $0.00
Makeup you owe $0.00

 
Vedder1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 02, 2006
Location: London
Posts: 25,536
Default


Quote:
Originally Posted by rayzor1748 View Post
Not too sure if I like the call here... I would tend to think he wouldn't push against your stack with atc ... as he probably would fear being called by the big stack... of course being only 3 handed your playable hand range does increase abit; just personally hate risking doubling him up knowing (assuming) you're going into it behind to begin with...
Again i let the play at the table dictate my call. He hadnt had an unopened pot to get aggro with - as mu saw i won from 4 handed in about 11 hands. I think i may have been guilty of playing the rush a little, im not sure. I do think howether giving his rapidly dwindling stack and the ferocious nature of the blinds in these he almost had to shove there.

I do think its pretty tight and in another spot i could happily lay it down.

Stu.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by draqq View Post
^ that being said it seems like all the big winners in the the 60/45s the last year or so, nsb incl., had serious ICM leaks and seemed to always operate closer to cEV, yet crush the games. so ICM probably is just a conspiracy to keep us all playing nitty while those in the know print money by playing straight cEV the whole time.
Vedder1980 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old February 18th, 2008, 09:03 PM   #10 (permalink)

Player points 2056.26
Staker points 25073.97
Makeup owed $0.00
Makeup you owe $0.00

 
rayzor1748's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 01, 1970
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 13,223
Default


Quote:
Originally Posted by Vedder1980 View Post
Again i let the play at the table dictate my call. He hadnt had an unopened pot to get aggro with - as mu saw i won from 4 handed in about 11 hands. I think i may have been guilty of playing the rush a little, im not sure. I do think howether giving his rapidly dwindling stack and the ferocious nature of the blinds in these he almost had to shove there.

I do think its pretty tight and in another spot i could happily lay it down.

Stu.
I can def see reasons to call , and reasons to fold... comes down to gut decisions sometimes and as you've said...playing that rush sometimes that's what makes poker so much damn fun
Honestly don't see anything terribly wrong with either decision..certainly not worthy of the "you're a donkey" comment for sure. But I still think I fold in that spot more often than not
__________________
"Beer Is Good"

rayzor1748 (buffalo) - stars
rayzor1748 - ftp /first letter B/ avatar venusflytrap
rayzor1748 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old February 18th, 2008, 09:17 PM   #11 (permalink)

Player points 64787.55
Staker points 141315.11
Makeup owed $0.00
Makeup you owe $0.00

 
Vedder1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 02, 2006
Location: London
Posts: 25,536
Default


Quote:
Originally Posted by rayzor1748 View Post
I can def see reasons to call , and reasons to fold... comes down to gut decisions sometimes and as you've said...playing that rush sometimes that's what makes poker so much damn fun
Honestly don't see anything terribly wrong with either decision..certainly not worthy of the "you're a donkey" comment for sure. But I still think I fold in that spot more often than not
I can understand that. These turbos are pretty much forming my profit right now so i think i have a good feel for these situations.

Stu.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by draqq View Post
^ that being said it seems like all the big winners in the the 60/45s the last year or so, nsb incl., had serious ICM leaks and seemed to always operate closer to cEV, yet crush the games. so ICM probably is just a conspiracy to keep us all playing nitty while those in the know print money by playing straight cEV the whole time.
Vedder1980 is offline   Reply With Quote


Advertisement
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:14 PM.


Feature Your BAP
(2 slots available)
















Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
All contents © 2005-2009 PartTimePoker, except for registered trademarks that are the properties of their respective owners.
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=