Quote:
blinds are 100/200
seat1 cutoff (1400 chips)
seat2 button (4500 chip) me
seat3 small b (1600 chips)
seat4 big b (6000 chips)
seat 3 posts sb
seat 4 posts bb
seat 2 dealt QQ
seat 1 folds
seat 2 ???
|
I tend to agree with everyone who posted but when you break it down it gets kinda questionable, well at least to me it does...I am not a pro or anything..
If I 3X raise and he shoves and I call I am 68%/32% to win when he is holding either a suited ace or suited K with a rag. he has two unders I am 82%/18% and underpair 80%/20%.
I cant imagine a shove all to often from two unders, but K high or A high against a guy who seems to understand ICM and bubble play I can see.
so by folding I eliminate the possibility that I bubble (at least for now) and by shoving I eliminate the chance of him shoving with rags and getting lucky.
Obviously I would like to double up, but with the short stacks only having ~7 bb's I am fairly certain I will get ITM, and have a solid shot at 2nd.
I guess unless I run into AA or KK it is likely that the only other way I am getting it all in here is if he shoves me with a suited A or K high...and I am 32% to get KO'ed and make no money.
If my hand holds I will be big stack, but unless I wipe out the remaining field all I have really done is secure 2nd with a good chance at winning.
any one agree with this?? or think I am nuts??
In the actual game I raised 3X bb and got insta shoved like I expected, I called and he had K high..my hand held and I went on to win.
but afterwards I thought that I might have made a mistake, because I know when I am short...I love seeing the big stacks collide, and often wondered why they risk getting KO'ed AI preflop when they could wait for me to get blinded or have the big stack call my weak shoves...
according to ICM I have 32% equity before hand is dealt
if I lose I have zero
if I win I have 42% equity...
prize pool of $90 dollars that would be a difference of $9.00 in equity between folding and getting it all in and winning.